Feb 15, 2017 in 1922, albert einstein and the great french philosopher henri bergson publicly debated the nature of time. Canales has rescued from near oblivion a fascinating, highly significant debate that is still relevant in an age which has begun uneasily to question the hegemony of science and its uncontrollable child, technology. Bergson thinks of time as duration and subjective, i. A history 2009 as well as numerous articles on the history of modernity. Oct 06, 2000 bergson focused his criticism on einstein s special theory of relativity. Duration, according to bergson, is the succession of qualitatively heterogeneous psychical states, all melting together in a unity which nonetheless discloses intensive multiplicity and thus, is not static. Henri bergson was an actually thrilling philosopher to read. Similarly with einstein, bergson definitively fucked up in the debate in terms of his own positive account of simultaneity, but he was also entirely right that einsteins own account did indeed leave out time in any substantive sense. Einstein vs bergson, science vs philosophy and the meaning. Confusing biological rhythms and physical clocks todays. This theory led to paradoxes from a common sense point of view such that bergsons thought undermined einsteins theory. According to bergson s philosophy, bergson s concept of time does not agree with the idea of presentism. Under all interpretations though, jamais vous ne tirerez du schema. The einstein bergson debate took place in paris on april 6, 1922.
Einstein, bergson, and the debate that changed our understanding of time. Challenger to einsteins theory of time times higher. Einsteins relativity and its reception is definitely a prominent option for a casestudy aiming to highlight the impact of the sociocultural environment to the formulation of the scientific image of the world and other aspects of the worldview of a. Whose arguments were more convincing in the einstein vs. Changed our understanding of time, by jimena canales, princeton, nj, princeton. Einstein considered bergson s theory of time to be a soft, psychological notion, irreconcilable with the quantitative realities of physics. This theory led to paradoxes from a common sense point of view such that bergson s thought undermined einstein s theory. Tilman sauer, jimena canales, the physicist and the philosopher.
Henri bergsons family lived in london for a few years after his birth, and he obtained an early familiarity with the english language from his mother. Canales is an excellent account of the debate in the context of the league of nations and the differing political views of bergson and einstein. How did these discussions affect the unraveling of the debate. Almost 100 years after the einsteinbergson debate canales, 2015. Einstein vs bergson, science vs philosophy and the meaning of. Einstein, bergson, and the debate that changed our understanding of time, hopos. On april 6, 1922, in paris, albert einstein and henri bergson publicly debated the nature of time. Henri bergsons debate with albert einstein swayed the 1921.
At the time, many thought that physics had everything figured out and it wasnt long until everything, including human behavior, could be predicted using. Einstein, bergson and the debate that changed our understanding of time. The clash between physics and philosophy the canonical interpretation of the 1922 debate that our conference is meant to revisit is that einstein the mathematical physicist won out over bergson the philosopher by dismissing any role for. Einstein, bergson, and the debate that changed our understanding. Einstein, at least, never again publicly engaged with bergsons views, although canales points out a few instances in which he mentions bergson.
Einstein, bergson, and the debate that changed our understanding of time princeton university press, 2015 michael foley. Einstein, bergson, and the debate that changed our understanding of time einsteins cosmos. Jimena canales is the author of the awardwinning the physicist and the philosopher. Anyway my comments were general, theyre not specific to bergson and einstein in particular. Feb 23, 2017 somewhat surprisingly, for einstein scholars, jimena canales takes the brief exchange between einstein and bergson in paris on april 6, 1922, as a debate that changed our understanding of time. Henri bergson 18591941 was a famous french philosopher and a nobel laureate whose theory of time relates directly to the idea of freewill. Jimena canales introduces readers to the revolutionary ideas of einstein and bergson, describes how they dramatically collided in paris, and. The einsteinbergson debate took place in paris on april 6, 1922. Full text of duration and simultaneity henri bergson. In 1922, albert einstein and the great french philosopher henri bergson publicly debated the nature of time. Einstein, bergson and the debate that changed our understanding of time 2015 and a tenth of a second. The debate between einstein and bergson needs to be understood in the context of bergsons duree et simultaneite. One reason that the bergson einstein debate impacted the nobel committee to such a degree was academic politics.
One reason that the bergsoneinstein debate impacted the nobel committee to such a degree was academic politics. The physicist and the philosopher tells the remarkable story of how this explosive debate transformed our understanding of time and drove a rift between science and the humanities that persists today. Processed on a psychosophical way, integrally with other aspects. The most well known of these paradoxes is the twin paradox, in which one twin stays on earth while the other goes on a rocket journey. Pure time has a real duration which is different from mathematical time that is perceived as discrete units. Though time and space were separate for newton something that einstein challenged, the clock time he assumed was laid out like space and was devoid of the dynamism of bergsonian duree, bergson, 1912. Einstein develops special and then general relativity which is confirmed by the 1919 solar eclipse making him a worldwide sensation, then bergson challenges his notions of time at a paris conference in 1922 and in the subsequent debate einstein is generally declared the winner eroding bergsons. Einstein develops special and then general relativity which is confirmed by the 1919 solar eclipse making him a worldwide sensation, then bergson challenges his notions of time at a paris conference in 1922 and in the subsequent debate einstein is generally declared the winner eroding bergson s. Bergsons creative evolution, published in 1907, had put him on the map, and introduced perhaps his most enduring idea elan vital. The explosive debate that transformed our views about time and scientific truth. He says, the time that physicists measure by clocks, is objectively real, and so, real in a way that what he refers to philosophers time is not. While the debate was for the most part removed from einstein s legacy, it was periodically brought up by many of bergson s followers.
Oct 04, 2016 the physicist and the philosopher is an extraordinarily rich and wideranging work. Somewhat surprisingly, for einstein scholars, jimena canales takes the brief exchange between einstein and bergson in paris on april 6, 1922, as a debate that changed our understanding of time. While the debate was for the most part removed from einsteins legacy, it was periodically brought up by many of bergsons followers. This modest postscript to an earlier post owes a great deal to jimena canales paper on the bergson einstein debate, published in project muse. Henri bergsons greatgreatgrandfather, szmul jakubowicz sonnenberg, called zbytkower, was a prominent banker and a protege of stanislaw ii augustus, king of poland from 1764 to 1795. It was laplace who treated time as just another dimension equivalent to space, and thereby paved the way for the development.
Einstein and bergson had an argument over the nature of time. Einstein, bergson, and the debate that changed our understanding of time jimena canales. The physicist and the philosopher is a lively and engaging account of the meaning of time in the twentieth century. Isbn 9780691165349 in march 1924, french author andre gide opened his journal.
Bergson is known for his arguments that processes of immediate experience and intuition are more significant than abstract rationalism and science for. A few years before their deaths, bergson wrote about einstein, and einstein mentioned bergson one last time. It all began in 1922, when einstein and bergson met in an unplanned but fateful debate. Einstein, bergson, and the debate that changed our understanding of time jimena canales princeton univ. Einstein, bergson, and the debate that changed our understanding of time princeton university press bergson, henri, bergson, henri louis, canales, jimena, einstein. Einstein considered bergsons theory of time to be a soft, psychological notion, irreconcilable with the quantitative realities of physics. Although part of the debate seemed to deal with technical details e. Animation about time based on debate april 6th, 1922 in paris between einstein and bergson. Einstein, bohr, and the great debate about the nature of reality albert einstein. Albert einstein, bergsoneinstein debate, henri bergson, philosophy of science, physics and philosophy, politics and science, theory of relativity, twin paradox. How did the debate between einstein and bergson unravel.
I remember, as a young, impressionable high school student, being exposed to his 1907 creative evolution, which introduced his ideas surrounding the elan vital, the vital impetus that. Similarly with einstein, bergson definitively fucked up in the debate in terms of his own positive account of simultaneity, but he was also entirely right that einstein s own account did indeed leave out time in any substantive sense. Bergson focused his criticism on einsteins special theory of relativity. The topic to be addressed in this paper, that is, the distinction between the concept of time and the being of the clock, divides into two parts. Einstein considered bergsons theory of time to be a soft, psychological notion. Einstein, bergson, and the debate that changed our understanding of time bergson, henri, bergson, henri louis, canales, jimena, einstein, albert on april 6, 1922, in paris, albert einstein and henri bergson publicly debated the nature of time. Einstein had been invited to give a presentation in paris on his theory of relativity. All im arguing is that einstein was a scientific realist. How albert einsteins vision transformed our understanding of space and time. Einstein, at least, never again publicly engaged with bergson s views, although canales points out a few instances in which he mentions bergson. Minkowski, 1909 the concept of time became the fourth dimension2 and an integral element of the new physical worldview. At the time, many thought that physics had everything figured out and it wasnt long until everything, including human behavior, could be predicted using the scientific methods of physics and relativity. On april 6, 1922, in paris, albert einstein and henri bergson publicly debated.
I have come across various reconstructions, which however do not seem fully satisfactory. Full text of duration and simultaneity henri bergson see other formats. It caused confusion among many of einsteins contemporaries, and not only with. Canales uses the 1922 debate between albert einstein and henri bergson as a starting point from which to discuss an astonishing array of thinkers, technologies, and cultural developments. The journal of the international society for the history of philosophy of science 7, no. Einstein considered bergson s theory of time to be a soft, psychological notion, irreconcilable. Jul 10, 2012 this modest postscript to an earlier post owes a great deal to jimena canales paper on the bergson einstein debate, published in project muse. Postscript to the bergson einstein debate the journal of. Henri bergsons debate with albert einstein swayed the. Jul 15, 2015 animation about time based on debate april 6th, 1922 in paris between einstein and bergson. Einstein considered bergsons theory of time to be a soft, psychological notion, irreconcilable. They underlinedonce againjust how wrong the perspective of the other remained. Postscript to the bergson einstein debate the journal.
1302 1617 167 651 440 1450 225 1527 136 1170 1388 543 622 635 505 847 767 1504 835 1640 507 643 1341 251 946 1359 1405 542 741 803 850 889 341 170